Tag Archives: IFS Integrity

If your CAPA report is perfect, why are auditors still flagging the same issues year after year? Certification body data from 2025 shows that repeat findings are among the most persistent non-conformities across food manufacturing. Many are not due to missing documentation but because follow-up actions are never fully implemented. Key Patterns Identified — Corrective…

Hook: What happens when hygiene monitoring misses just one corner of the line? A recent recall in Europe shows how Listeria can hide where least expected.   A recent notification on the EU RASFF Portal reported Listeria monocytogenes in soft cheese products distributed across France and Spain. The contamination was traced back to moisture accumulation…

Can insufficient raw material testing put your most sensitive consumers at risk? A recent alert in the EU Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) reported pesticide contamination in baby food products distributed across multiple countries. The affected products, intended for infants and young children, were found to contain pesticide residues exceeding regulatory limits…

Some of the most common audit findings don’t stem from what’s on your surfaces — but what’s missing from your paperwork.   In recent audit cycles, gaps in cleaning documentation have become a recurring non-conformity. Not because companies aren’t cleaning but because the evidence is fragmented, inconsistent, or not linked to specific risks.   Here’s…

Can a single sanitation lapse put an entire product line at risk? In early 2025, a series of romaine lettuce recalls in Canada and the United States were linked to Listeria monocytogenes. The contamination, found in ready-to-eat salad kits, was eventually traced back to insufficient cleaning of conveyor belts and other food contact surfaces in…

You passed the paperwork check. But when the auditor interviews your floor staff do they know what’s in your FSMS documentation? In Q3 2025, certification bodies across Europe have flagged a rise in non-conformities triggered during audit interviews, not document checks. Why? Because staff couldn’t explain recall steps, CCPs, or even basic hygiene protocols they…

What happens when your only approved supplier fails an audit or worse, gets delisted? In 2025, several high-profile recalls across Europe were triggered by supplier non-conformities that caught manufacturers off guard. These incidents underscore the risk of depending on a single supplier for high-risk ingredients, especially in a regulatory climate that’s rapidly evolving. From contaminated…

Recent advancements in AI-powered sensors are transforming how food businesses approach shelf-life monitoring and contamination prevention. These sensors, often embedded directly into packaging, can now detect gases released by spoiling products and flag safety risks in real time. Several EU-based trials in 2025 particularly in chilled meat and seafood categories have demonstrated how smart packaging…

What happens when a supplier disappears mid-certification? One recent bankruptcy case left a major manufacturer scrambling for batch records and contaminant test results. In August 2025, a dry ingredient supplier in Germany filed for bankruptcy during the peak production period. As the business ceased operations, one of its B2B clients, a large food brand, was…

The European Commission adopted Regulation (EU) 2023/915 on 25 April 2023, which overhauled rules on maximum contaminant levels, including heavy metals, in food. This regulation replaced the previous standard (EC 1881/2006) and has been legally binding since 25 May 2023. Among its requirements, the regulation sets significantly lower limits for lead (0.020 mg/kg) and cadmium (0.040 mg/kg) in baby food and…